Reader. Dreamer. Writer.
Elizabeth Gaskell tells the story of a fallen woman in the Victorian period in her novel Ruth.
When Ruth Hilton’s parents die, her guardian helps her to secure the position of an apprentice at a seamstress’ shop. Sixteen year old Ruth is befriended by Mr. Bellingham who convinces her that he is in love with her. They run away and Ruth finds herself becoming his mistress. When Mr. Bellingham falls ill, his mother sees it as the perfect opportunity to whisk her son away from the temptress that is Ruth. Alone, abandoned, moneyless and pregnant, Ruth finds a friend in Mr. Benson, minister of a small congregation. After a lot of persuasion, she moves in with Mr. Benson and his sister and starts a new life with an invented past. But what happens when the past catches up with her?
The Good
Elizabeth Gaskell’s bravery in writing a novel that touches on such sensitive topics is commendable, especially since she is the wife of a minister. The public must have been furious for writing a novel that talks about illegitimacy. Ruth has a brisk pace throughout, except in the middle where it drags a bit. Gaskell is successful in pointing out the hypocrisy prevalent in the Victorian society. When Sally, Mr. Benson’s household help, is suspicious about the truth about Ruth, she makes her cut her hair like a widow before she accepts her. Mr. Bradshaw, who highly praises Ruth seems to forget all her good qualities when he comes to know of her past.
There are thought provoking passages on what the society considers as ‘sin’ (example : a fallen woman) and whether the church should accept or rebuke those who have sinned. Also, the burden of this sin falls solely on the woman’s shoulder and the man is never blamed, thanks to the gender hierarchy that existed in those times.
There is an underlying theme that defies the logic of ‘good looks make a gentleman’. By the examples of Mr. Bellingham and Mr. Benson, a hunchback, Gaskell effectively guides the reader through such examples that makes one see how weak or strong human nature can be.
The Bad
Perhaps in an attempt to make Ruth appealing to her readers, Gaskell strips her of all human vices. She is a virtuous, gentle, calm, ever-patient, never-complaining, selfless girl. She is the perfect heroine, except for her ‘sin’ in mothering an illegitimate child. So I think this characterisation of the young girl makes her seem unrealistic.
I enjoyed Vol. 1 and Vol. 3, but Vol. 2 greatly dampened my interest in the book. There were a lot of Biblical quotes and passages which gives an overall preachy tone to the book. Mr. Bellingham seems to be an unbelievable character. We know he walked out on Ruth, but in some portions in the book, Gaskell writes in his POV about how he loves (loved?) Ruth. It felt as if Gaskell was undecided whether to show Mr. Bellingham as the man who seduced and cheated a young girl or make the readers see his nice side (I could not see any) as well.
The ending greatly disappointed me and seemed as if Ruth was the one who had to pay the debts of sin throughout her life. Perhaps this was the only way in which the novel would be accepted by the society of the Victorian times. But it made me feel unsatisfied because of the forced sympathy it tries to evoke in the reader.
Final Verdict
I liked the novel and found it to be a moving read. I would recommend reading it if you are a fan of Elizabeth Gaskell. However, if you are new to her work, I think North and South would be a better pick.
Title : Ruth
Author : Elizabeth Gaskell
Publisher : Penguin Classics
Published : 1853
Language : English
Pages : 375
Rating : 4/5
It’s too bad this one didn’t quite live up to expectations. It sounds like the sort of plot that has the potential to be a great novel. (Also, I think this has to be my favorite Penguin Classics cover!)
I haven’t read any of Gaskell’s work but I do have North and South on my shelf and am looking forward to reading it.
North and South is such a wonderful read. Gaskell is like a realistic version of Austen- more hardships and social class struggle depicted in her stories. I hope you will love the read Kate. Maybe if you become a Gaskell fan you can read Ruth too.
I may have to keep North and South in Mind. I admit I am not familiar with Gaskell’s work. This is such a lovely review. I love how you so effortlessly breakdown the pros and cons!
Thank you. I hope you will love North and South
I haven’t read anything by Gaskell as of yet but I’ve had North and South recommended to me more than once! I do recall lots of female characters that were stripped of vices as you say when I was studying 18th century lit. Seemed to be a cultural theme lol
I was not aware of this one! I loved North and South, maybe I should really try this one! Although I bet it will make me sad. It’s such a tough subject, especially because in 1988, a century later I was the reason mom had to marry dad :/ so these things trigger me a little. But it would be quite interesting to see the Victorian take on it! Also, I can kind of understand the preachiness and Biblical quotes. A lot of Victorian books have that, really. I guess it was in the times?
Yes, you are right. And I think Gaskell included more of it in Ruth to make her acceptable to the masses. Because I did not see such a style in North and South. Hope you enjoy the read. 🙂
I remember reading Ruth when I was in college and being disappointed by the ending too. Mary Barton is another of Gaskell’s works that I read in school and enjoyed overall. I actually haven’t read North and South yet, but it sounds like I definitely should. Wonderful review!
North and south is a great read. I would recommend you to pick it up. I need to read Mary Barton. Hope I will love it. 🙂
One of my podcast listeners sent me your review. I’m curious to know if you think Ruth’s weaknesses would benefit from what we do at the CraftLit podcast. You can hear a sample with Gaskell’s North and South (episode 331 starts the book at CraftLit.com/331) if you listen at roughly the 16 minute mark. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Reading your review was very interesting to me, because I recently read Tess of the d’Ubervilles and I feel like the plot and themes were very similar to Ruth – even though I haven’t read Ruth. I’m not sure I’ll pick this one up, because oh well, while I loved Tess of the d’Ubervilles, it was hard to read at times because of the themes. However, I have read North and South by Elizabeth Gaskell, loved it and I’m looking forward to read more books by her!
I am not familiar with Gaskell’s work– so I appreciate your recommendation of starting with North and South first!
I think a lot of Victorian writers tend to make their heroines unrealistic when there is a religious moral. This trend is to try and make them the perfect embodiment of their religious values and show that most sin is projected on those who don’t deserve it. Considering the time this was written, I think that Ruth was probably quite forward thinking. These books addresses a lot or controversial ideas for the time. Good for her!
I have never read Gaskell but I would like to. I tend to live Victorian writers.
I agree with Jackie. Sometimes writers of this era made their heroines so unrealistically virtuous. Even Anthony Trollope who usually made all his characters complex sometimes fell into this.
I will probably read North and South soon.
Oh yes! I would highly recommend North and South. Gaskell is like a realistic Austen if you know what I mean – less balls and running around for love, more harsh realities of the Industrial revolution and poverty and class struggle which is easily relateable in modern times.
Sounds good- I did like North and South, though I wasn’t blown away, so I’d quite like to check this out. Great review!
Thank you. I enjoyed North and South more. I found it to be a very realistic take on the society that existed back then. Hope you will like Ruth.
PBS has a marvelously done serialized version of it – Mr Thornton is played by Richard Armitage (and is quite dreamy) but the one who stole the show (I thought) was the woman who played his mother. Made of steel, she was. I interviewed a Victorian lit professor who approved of the changes they made for dramatic purposes, too.
This is one I definitely want to read. I have had my eye on it for a while. 🙂
I hope you will enjoy the read. It is not Gaskell’s best but worth a read.